Posted on January 6, by Scott Alexander [Epistemic status: Content warning for discussion of suicide, murder, and race] I. There was a mass shooting — this time, in San Bernardino, California.
I will try to do this today with the hope to be able to shed some light on a rather bizarre attack which will nevertheless have profound consequences. To believe that it would require you to find the following sequence logical: Then, the US declares that overthrowing Assad is not a priority anymore up to here this is all factual and true.
Then, Assad decides to use weapons he does not have.
He decides to bomb a location with no military value, but with lots of kids and cameras. Then, when the Russians demand a full investigation, the Americans strike as fast as they can before this idea gets any support.
And now the Americans are probing a possible Russian role in this so-called attack.
Frankly, if you believe any of that, you should immediately stop reading and go back to watching TV. For the rest of us, there are three options: This option requires you to believe in coincidences.
Unless, the US fed bad intelligence to the Syrians and got them to bomb a location where the US knew that toxic gas was stored. What is evident is that the Syrians did not drop chemical weapons from their aircraft and that no chemical gas was ever stored at the al-Shayrat airbase.
There is no footage showing any munitions or containers which would have delivered the toxic gas. As for US and other radar recordings, all they can show is that an aircraft was in the sky, its heading, altitude and speed.
There is no way to distinguish a chemical munition or a chemical attack by means of radar. Whatever option you chose, the Syrian government is obviously and self-evidently innocent of the accusation of having used chemical weapons. This is most likely a false flag attack.
Also, and just for the record, the US had been considering exactly such a false flag attack in the past. You can read everything about this plan here and here. American and Russian sources both agree on the following facts: The US did not consult with the Russians on a political level, but through military channels the US gave Russia 2 hours advance warning.
At this point the accounts begin to differ. The Americans say that all missiles hit their targets. The Russians say that only 23 cruise missiles hit the airfield. Here I think that it is indisputable that the Americans are lying and the Russians are saying the truth: Furthermore, the Syrian Air Force resumed its operations within 24 hours.
That is a fact. It is also indisputable that there were no chemical munitions at this base as nobody, neither the Syrians nor the Russian reporters, had to wear any protective gear.
The missiles used in the attack, the Tomahawk, can use any combination of three guidance systems: GPS, inertial navigation and terrain mapping. There is no evidence and even no reports that the Russians shot even a single air-defense missile.
While the Tomahawk cruise missile was developed in the s, there is no reason to believe that the missiles used had exceeded their shelf live and there is even evidence that they were built in The Tomahawk is known to be accurate and reliable.
There is absolutely no basis to suspect that over half of the missiles fired simply spontaneously malfunctioned. I therefore see only two possible explanations for what happened to the 36 missing cruise missiles:Access the latest politics analysis and economic growth summary through for Brazil from The Economist Intelligence Unit.
Uses and Abuses of Gresham's Law in the History of Money. Robert Mundell. Columbia university. August Introduction.
|POKÉMON IN UKRAINE: Tactical War Game Introduction Manual||Markets Economists study trade, production and consumption decisions, such as those that occur in a traditional marketplace.|
|Automatic Bibliography Maker||Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.|
|BibMe: Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard||Buzzfeed For Cassandra Smolcic, the trouble began at her dream internship.|
|Glossary of research economics||History[ edit ] Early proposals of monetary systems targeting the price level or the inflation rate, rather than the exchange rate, followed the general crisis of the gold standard after World War I.|
|Publication Highlight||Good Money Drives out Bad?|
Early Expressions. 2. Faulty Renderings. The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College is a non-profit, nonpartisan, public policy think tank. For a better understanding of the topic, a quick look at the Brazilian economic history has to be made.
This will take all readers to the same. Data and research on economic outlooks, analysis and forecasts, including economic projections, economic outlooks, economic surveys, OECD forecasts during and after the financial crisis., Brazil - Economic forecast summary.
🔥Citing and more! Add citations directly into your paper, Check for unintentional plagiarism and check for writing mistakes.